Friday, September 20, 2013

Starbucks way to go F the NRA

Most people recognize this logo as a symbol of excellence in the hot brewed beverage industry and they are truly a giant in it.  While I'm not a fan of their products I am a huge fan of their policy’s and operating procedures.

Starbucks is described as one of the best companies in America.  While you may not get rich working there they do offer full benefits for part-time employees.

Now who does that?

A company that puts employees first.  A company that cares about their workers, because they understand that the workers are the backbone of their very industry.

I see places that proudly advertise "No shirt, no shoes no Service", as an Afro American I can tell you personally of places that would not serve me or provide lousy service just because of the color of my skin.  The mantra of American's among the group I'm about to direct is "We reserve the right!!!"

Well they have done something outrageous.  They have nerve and audacity to say they don't want patrons in their Coffee Shops with weapons.  What makes them so special that they are not willing to be the scene of the next violent rampage of some psychotic shooter.  Only thing I can think of is that they actually care about not only the Employees, but the Patrons as well.

So when I heard this I was like WOW they are doing it again, taking a stand for something they believe in and I respect.

Who did this upset?

The obvious, the NRA and their supporters.  So I guess the phrase "We reserve the right" means nothing now.

I still haven't figured out the purpose of this organization, I know what people believe and think, but I mean their true purpose.  As far as I can tell they are nothing more than a lobbying agent for the gun makers.  They don't care about you defending yourself, they just want to sell you a gun.

There is a reason that the majority of the banks across the country do not have armed guards any more and it's no accident.  They realized that armed conflicts were more likely to end in the loss of life and no one wants to lose a customer.

The actual number of home owners buying guns have went down, but the number of gun sells have went up.  So that can only mean that there are more and more bad guys with guns.  I guess gun owners got tired of their loved ones dying from accidents in the home.

No matter how many incidents like that of last week happen the NRA is there to tell you gun ownership is right and your mental capacity doesn't matter in their eyes, nor does your violent background or even your ability to see.  See in some states even if you are blind and I'm not talking legally blind you have the right and can own a gun.

I will give the NRA this much credit.  When there a shooing in a school they do not lobby to have the children armed, but that's a technicality.  I'm sure if they could the would lobby to get the age of gun ownership lowered.  On second thought they did try to arm the teachers, "Little Johnny I told you to sit down,  bam bam bam, I bet you listen to me next time!!!"

Gun laws and regulations is not the answer.  They do not work and we see that everyday.  The only Gun Reform that has a chance of working is to get rid of the guns, plane and simple.  Why are we lobbying and protecting a right that as outdated as the theory of the Earth being flat?

To stop gun violence you have to get rid of the guns....all of them.

I guess "We reserve the right" only means something when the people with the reservations aren't the one's being referred to.

I think Starbucks got it right, I can see where they might be in more harm from the beach bum without their shirt on then the guy with the Uzi.  I mean why worry about an automatic weapon when Skeeter doesn't have on a shirt or even worse spreading foot fungus.

Kudos to Starbucks once again, they keep it up like this and I may have to start patronizing them.

The Affordable Healthcare Act AKA Obamacare

Ok we are at this point again where we are inundated with the talks of appealing the Affordable Healthcare Act well known as Obamacare.

As on Jan 2014 everyone has to have healthcare or they can be assess a fee.

Is this a good thing?

Well, yes.  It insures millions of Americans that would normally go without healthcare.  Remember he won his second election by a landslide, which if you followed my blog you would have seen that I predicted that, but I digress.

I can remember a day when I didn't have healthcare, mainly because it was too expensive.  The HMO's had their way, now keep in mind that the HMO's are nothing more then middlemen charging exorbitant fees for services that they in dire cases will not cover.  As a working American without health insurance I could only hope I never needed treatment or a hospital visit which would have left me in ruins.

There is always talk of Health Reform, which is what the Affordable Healthcare Act originally was until he was forced to pass a striped down version.  So what do we get with this new striped down version?

Here's a list:
  • Prohibiting health insurers from refusing coverage based on patients' medical histories
  • Prohibiting health insurers from charging different rates based on patients' medical histories or gender
  • Repeal of insurance companies' exemption from anti-trust laws
  • Establishing minimum standards for qualified health benefit plans
  • Requiring most employers to provide coverage for their workers or pay a surtax on the workers wage up to 8%
  • Restrictions on abortion coverage in any insurance plans for which federal funds are used
  • An expansion of Medicaid to include more low-income Americans by increasing Medicaid eligibility limits to 133% of the Federal Poverty Level and by covering adults without dependents as long as either or any segment doesn't fall under the narrow exceptions outlined by various clauses throughout the proposal
  • A subsidy to low- and middle-income Americans to help buy insurance
  • A central health insurance exchange where the public can compare policies and rates
  • Allowing insurors to continue to dictate limits on evaluation and care provided consumers by their physicians ("managed" or "rationed" care)
  • Avoidance of capitating or regulating premiums which are routinely and in accordance with this law, charged by an insurance company for coverage, which might make the coverage non-affordable with regard to a consumer's income
  • Requiring most Americans to carry or obtain qualifying health insurance coverage or face a fine for non-compliance.
  • A 5.4% surtax on individuals whose adjusted gross income exceeds $500,000 ($1 million for married couples filing joint returns)
  • A 2.5% excise tax on medical devices
  • Reductions in projected spending on Medicare of $400 billion over a ten-year period
  • Inclusion of language originally proposed in the Tax Equity for Domestic Partner and Health Plan Beneficiaries Act
  • Inclusion of language originally proposed in the Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments of 2009.
  • Imposing a $2,500 limit on contributions to flexible spending accounts (FSAs), which allow for payment of health costs with pre-tax funds, to pay for a portion of health care reform costs.
Now what is bad about those points?

Forcing the insurers to cover people that pay them.  Stopping the insurers from charging whatever they want for a procedure.  Allowing people to shop around for better rates - I figure women will  love that one.  Requiring most companies to contribute less they they already do for their employees, keep in mind that about 35% to 40% of the companies do not contribute a dime to their employees healthcare.

In most cases the low income people are families are already cover by federally subsidized insurance so it's really geared towards the shrinking middle class, but that will not be a problem soon as the middle class slips into oblivion.

The only real problem with the Affordable Healthcare Act is that as of Jan 2014 it will be in place enough to dispel all the rumours.  Americans love it enough to re-elect the person that is in charge of the most ineffective Congress in our short history as a country.  Something needs to be done soon or no on can say, "The only thing that he pushed for as a President didn't make it!"

Well I'm a Veteran so good luck everyone else.